Curricular Development Grant
The Curricular Development Grant supports significant, strategic, and impactful projects that develop and/or enhance curriculum and pedagogical approaches to address learning priorities. The total grant budget will be $20k annually.
All grant proposals must have a divisional sponsor. This ensures proposals have adequate support to succeed and are vetted for strategic impact. In general, two awards of up to $10k will be made annually; each division can sponsor one project for up to $10k in funding. Programs may partner with another division/divisions to sponsor a second proposal. Selected proposals will be funded for the full proposed amount. Proposal applications are due in February and awards will be announced by the end of March.
Proposals are reviewed by the Curriculum Committee and ranked based on a clear scoring system that will be provided to all in advance. Projects cannot be partially funded. The Curriculum Committee provides its ranked list to the provost who reviews the proposals and rankings to make a final decision. The Curriculum Committee will also provide constructive feedback for each proposal.
Each proposal will designate a ranked faculty liaison to Academic Affairs for the duration of the project; the liaison role is a service opportunity. The liaison will provide brief, regular updates to the provost during the grant and produce a brief summary report at the conclusion of the grant cycle. There may also be a presentation of the projects following the conclusion of the grant cycle.
Applications open November 1, 2019 and are due March 1, 2020.
Contact Julian Wong-Nelson, Manager of Academic Administration (email@example.com) or Dominick Tracy, Associate Provost (firstname.lastname@example.org) for additional information regarding the curricular development grant and the proposal process.
Proposals should explicitly align with at least one of the following strategic priorities (subject to annual updating):
- Example: Researching and developing a plan to move towards zero waste in a program’s studio classes and developing a template that other programs could follow to do the same.
- Diversity and Inclusion
- Example: Identifying and developing curricular areas where more diverse perspectives need to be included to provide students with a more comprehensive and inclusive view of the discipline. Providing training and materials that help faculty to incorporate such contributions.
- Unified Campus
- Example: Developing the concept of “neighborhood” course offerings and training faculty in the use of tools/methods in adjacent practices to promote interdisciplinary approaches.
- English Language Learner Success
- Example: Training instructors to revise courses using universal design principles and new materials/approaches that promote successful learning for English language learners.
Proposals may seek funding for activities such as retreats to revise curriculum and/or develop new course modules and materials, pedagogy trainings, site visits, consulting, learning ways to leverage new technologies, workshops, and attending conferences as well as for things like subscriptions or memberships. Lead faculty proposers may receive up to 10% each of the overall proposal budget as a stipend for their work.
Proposals will provide a detailed budget accounting for all expenditures; divisions or other entities may choose to provide additional funding that can be noted in the budget.
In addition to the priority areas identified above, proposals are asked to articulate:
- Connections to strategic goals (see CCA Strategic Plan, the Academic Pathways report, divisional deans goals, and/or provost’s goals);
- Evidence of the need for the proposed initiative;
- A vision of the initiative’s impact on students and their learning;
- A definition of project success and a plan to assess it;
- An accounting of the initiative’s lasting impact and ability to serve as an exemplar/pilot for broader change if applicable;
- An explanation of how the initiative aligns with successful practices or builds on other models of good practice; and
- If applicable, ways the initiative addresses the needs of a broad range of students.
Ideally, work would begin as soon as practical following the awarding of the grant to build on momentum achieved in the proposal process; and initiatives should be complete-able by the end of the subsequent academic year.